Law Rare Materials Classification

The purpose of this amendment is to provide responses to questions recieved. Please see questions and responses below: Question : Will the gov't allow text in tables and graphics to be smaller than 12-point font and single-spaced? Response : Yes Question : Will the gov't permit text in bulleted or numbered lists to be single spaced? Response : Yes Question : In L.3.3(c), the requirements for the description of Past Performance list both a company name and customer. Can the gov't clarify if Company name here refers to the offeror or the name of the customer or what is the distinction between the two? Response : The company name refers to the company in which the offeror has performed previous services for. The Customer is the POC within that company. Question : In Section C.7.3, the library requests documentation of the "quality assurance policies and procedures which demonstrate effective independent review of contract staff quality and quantity" as a deliverable. Does the "effective independent review" mentioned refer to the independent review by the Law Library referenced in C.6.2 (either by designated Law Library staff or contractor) or is the Gov't seeking for the offeror to provide an additional independent review of the material by the staff of the offeror? Response : It is asking for the offeror to essentially perform a self-check to make sure the work is being done properly so that the Independent review by the Law Library is not a waste of time because a large percentage of items are being flagged. The offeror should describe how they intend to identify/prevent any systemic mistakes they are making. Question : In L.3.3, the instructions state that the technical section "is not to exceed 15 pages in length." Can the gov't clarify if this includes the sections for Experience of Key Personnel (L.3.3(b)), Past Performance (L.3.3(c)) or if the restriction applies just the Technical Approach (L.3.3(a))? Response : The 15 page limit is just for the Technical Approach.