The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions received from prospective offerors.

9. You mentioned there was currently 1000 UT. What does UT stand for?9. Ans: see Amendment #1 8. Would you happen to have a TCLP for the metals listed on the RFP? This will show if the waste is RCRA or RCRA stabilization ?8. Ans: see Q#1 below 7. Question: Technology is currently available (i.e. http://www.ecobondlbp.com) which allows lead-based paint to be removed in a non-hazardous manner. Is there any reason why this technology cannot be used to render the lead-based paint chips non-hazardous thereby reducing costs for this project?7. Answer: This is an additive, combined with paint remover, for paint stripping to remove paint from painted surfaces. The paint chips we are cleaning off the decks have already fallen off walls or broken pieces of deck paint. 6. Question: Is Gov't providing the drums? 6. Ans: Yes 5. Question What time is sol. Due? 5. Ans: 3PM PST 4. Question: what address to send in proposal ? 4. Ans: send via email: [email protected] 3. Question: Who is the incumbent contractor for this task order? 3. Ans: None, this is a new requirement. 2. Question : what is average number of drums / task order?: 2. Ans: 25 drums, 1.5. Question: what is a avg. cost/task order? 1.5. Ans: price average: $270./dr. 1. Question: Are the lead-based paint chips RCRA or CA regulated, Non-RCRA Waste?1. Ans: RCRA D008 and CA 352